Skip to main content

PARADIGM OF FAMILY AS A SUPPORT SYSTEM


I come from a society that strongly believes in the proverb when two carry, it does not hurt. The strongest and most basic unit in the African society is the family. Family is our strength and our pride, it is our link to the past and a bridge to the future. The family unit is the rock that stays steady, it is the glue that binds and keeps individuals together. It is an institution that works!
Due to the value the Ghanaian society places on the family, its role with regard to supportive care cannot be underestimated especially in the event of chronic illness. Chronic illnesses generally do not fix themselves and usually have no cure. For instance, heart disease and stroke can be life-threatening and may result in physical impairment requiring long-term lifestyle changes and intensive management. Families therefore, provide instrumental support such as transportation to the hospital, paying bills and assistance with the daily needs that are associated with the diagnosis (Given, 2001). Their presence is an important source of psychological stability to the patient. Family as a support system also improves recovery since the family can collaborate during the therapeutic process and participate in the planning of the patient’s care (Bellou, 2001). Thus, the bigger the family size and resources, the bigger the safety net and the better the prognosis.
when two carry, it does not hurt
A typical example is the family approach to diabetes management which highlights patient and family self-management. The model emphasizes the inclusion of a family support system as a form of clinical intervention strategy. This includes the involvement of family as active supervisors and consultants in the diabetes management strategy (Solowiejczyk, 2004). It is a cost-effective means of delivering favourable clinical outcomes and improving the quality of life. Family support proved to improve prognosis and quality of life because of the unit’s ability to increase the chances of the patient sticking to the treatment plan. They encouraged healthy choices by boosting the patient’s ability to cope with the stress of both the diagnoses and the physical limitations associated with it (Solowiejczyk, 2004).
A study conducted by Glick et al. (2011) on the role of the family and improvement in treatment, maintenance, adherence and outcome for schizophrenia, stated that patients with available family support regardless of interpersonal issues between the patient and the family improved the outcome. This was mediated by improving long term adherence to therapy.




The role of the family unit has already been described as an integral system of the Ghanaian culture. Therefore a better understanding of the important role that the family support system plays in chronic illness management is necessary to improve the efficiency of this intervention. It is imperative that caregivers are adequately equipped and supported by the provision of information, support, and assistance. Information about the dimension of the care to be provided such as nutritional considerations and even the financial aspect should be made available (Given, 2001). The needs of the caregivers should not go unattended. The complexity and the demanding nature of the support needed by the patient, some of which require expertise that the family may not have, just increases the frustration and the anxiety of the family. Therefore, the powerful centuries-old African proverb, when two carry, it does not hurt can only be fulfilled when information becomes a key resource for family caregivers.


Author: Josephine Menyah 



REFERENCES
Bellou P. Gerogianni K G. The Contribution of Family in the Care of Patient at the Hospital. Health Science Journal. MedPub LTD. 2001
Given B., Given C, Kozachik. Family Support in Advaced Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51-213-231
Glick ID, Stekoll AH, Hays S. The Role of the Family and Improvement in Treatment, Maintenance, Adherence and Outcome for Schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2011.
Solowiejczyk J. The Family Approach to Diabetes Management: Theory Into Practice Toward Development of New Paradigm. Diabetes Spectrum 2004; 17(1):31-36

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

STRESS AND COPING WITH IT

Stress is something we can all relate to because at a certain point in time we have all had to deal with some amount of it. It is usually a transient overwhelming feeling of incapability in busy life periods but can easily become a chronic condition if left unresolved. It is so prevalent in our lives and so it becomes important for us to develop ways of dealing with it. Not dealing with stress properly whether it be by avoidance, drinking or smoking will eventually manifest as illnesses. It can increase the chance of hypertension, gastrointestinal issues and can also worsen conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease. Additionally, for those with children, chronic stress can put your children at risk of developing Asthma. Excessive stress can even cause premature death. This article will suggest some healthy and straightforward coping mechanisms. One method of coping with stress is known as the problem-focused coping approach or in other words is to actively alter the stressful

OUR FIRST POST!!!!

Sel, there’s no one here! Think we got here first…yippee, hi five! We are super chuffed to have you join us on our journey through a myriad of psychological thoughts and concepts. The Psychology component of GEMP 425 - Population, Health And Medical Statistics was an interesting roller coaster ride in our final preclinical semester. From the first day Prof. Ofori-Attah walked into the MB2 Auditorium and asked us to debate the 'pros and cons of euthanasia' , we knew we were in for a jolly good ride. Starting off with discussing ‘Paradigms in Healthcare’  to investigating ‘Stress and Illness’ as well as honing our patient-doctor communication skills, we went through the entire nine yards in this aspect of the course! Welcome! This blog is a result of our hard work and passion. It contains vital information on psychosocial issues through a medical lens. Learn and have fun as you interact with the articles, illustrations and videos. Hop on to the 'Paradigms

HOW DOES NEW AND IMPROVED TECHNOLOGY AFFECT THE PARADIGM OF MEDICINE/HEALTH?

Technology has changed the way things are normally done in medicine and healthcare. Sometimes for the better, other times for worse. Technology has made collecting data and managing of health records easier with computerized methods instead of the age-old, hard copy hospital file which is quite difficult to find at times. Technology also makes us aware of ailments of global importance with social media updates to inform us of spread of these ailments and prevention techniques. Improvements in technology has aided to the discovery of cures for many diseases and better treatment methods for conditions such as cancers. All these may affect the paradigm of medicine we are used to in some ways. The true challenge however is the scourge of the internet and mobile phone applications that tend to replace the actual visit to the hospital or the input of a health professional. Doctor visits can be expensive and a bit inconvenient at times so why not just use the internet or an applicat

MOOD DISORDERS WITH EMPHASIS ON BIPOLAR DISORDER

Mood disorders are a category of illnesses that describe a serious change in mood. Though many different subtypes are recognized, three major states of mood disorders exist: depressive, manic, and bipolar. Bipolar disorder previously referred to as manic depression is a multifactorial illness with uncertain aetiology. It is a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs like depression and mania. The cycling between both depressed and manic moods is what characterises bipolar mood disorder. Epidemiology Epidemiological studies have suggested a lifetime prevalence of around 1% for bipolar type I in the general population. A large cross-sectional survey of 11 countries found the overall lifetime prevalence of bipolar spectrum disorders was 2.4%, with a prevalence of 0.6% for bipolar type I and 0.4% for bipolar type II. There are several types of bipolar and related disorders including cyclothymic disorder but the two types of bipo