Human behaviour, much of which is influenced by
social, cultural, economic, and political factors, is clearly related to
health, including the risk for infectious diseases like malaria. There are many
reasons why particular behaviours exist and they often are tied to considerable
benefits in areas quite distinct from health. The principal reason for which
people do not accept new kinds of health behaviour is that the behaviour being
advocated is inconvenient, produces unwanted side-effects, or does not give
visible results (MacCormack, 1984). Thus, it is not always the case that “these
people do not know any better," but rather that their native logic and
rationality make sense within the realities and limitations of their local
circumstances.
Poverty creates preconditions to malaria, in that
the means to acquire protection such as treated bed nets, repellants and
insecticides from mosquitoes are hindered. It is well established in the world
that morbidity and mortality rates are directly associated with socioeconomic
status. The lower the status the higher the rates. In malarious regions, the
poor are disproportionately at risk for the disease (Dunn, 1979).
Health-seeking behaviours of individuals also
influence other people's risk of getting malaria. For example, in Orissa State,
India, tribal people do not take treatment for malaria or take part in parasite
control because they do not consider mosquito bites to be harmful and consider
malaria as a mild disease. Research from rural areas in other developing
countries show the widespread belief that mosquitoes do not transmit malaria.
Untreated people are potential for spreading parasites and so in a locality
where there are individuals with the malaria parasite who do not seek medical
treatment, mosquitoes carry the plasmodium parasites and transmit from these
infected people to uninfected persons through their bites. Thus, physical
environment, and people's proximity and exposure to vectors or parasites,
including microbiological and parasitological factors, are clearly essential
for transmission of infection and constitute necessary and immediate risk
factors (Dunn, 1979).
Also, individual perceptions of illness, in this
case malaria, determine people's risk of getting malaria. In some traditions,
malaria or "fever" ,as popularly known, is a sign of growth and so is not one of a
bother.
It may seem strange that in some cultures, people
actively change their ecology in a way that will increase risk for disease.
They try to modify their environment to gain nutritional or convenience benefit
to the detriment of their disease status and then adapt to the new disease risk
(MacCormack, 1984). In the case of malaria, where marshy areas support the
successful breeding of mosquitoes, the culture of many considers the marshes an
important aspect of preserving their ecology and hence any disease associated
is of less importance or not even known.
Low
educational standard, impoverished housing, poor hygiene and general
environmental conditions of individuals also contribute to their risk of getting
malaria. Due to low level of insight, certain communities fail to understand
why they should prioritise malaria for elimination when there are other
pressing issues of hunger and other diseases whose prevention are far more
costlier, for example HIV/AIDS (Heinrich, 1985).
REFERENCES
Dunn, F.L. (1979). Behavioural Aspects of the
Control of Parasitic Diseases. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 57:
499-512.
Heinrich, M. (1985). The Anthropology of Malaria
Control. Central Issues in Anthropology. Pp. 27-40.
MacCormack, C.P. and Snow, R.W. (1986). Gambian
Cultural Preferences in the Use of Insecticide-Impregnated Bed Nets. Journal of
Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 89:295-302.
Comments
Post a Comment